For as long as humanity has existed, or anthropologically speaking Homo Sapien Sapien, it is intuitive to accept male and female must also exist. Anatomically it is apparent the human species is not asexual, and thus the different sexes must necessarily serve some purpose. Strictly speaking that purpose would be procreative, barring all notions of interpersonal communication bringing such emotions as love, happiness and belonging. In a scientific Darwinian fashion two sexes are necessary not …showed first 75 words of 1964 total…

…showed last 75 words of 1964 total…made her paper seem very egocentric, though unconsciously. This damages the forcefulness of the paper since she may have inadvertently excluded a large part of the female population who don't share the same ideals. While her paper provides an interesting look at the root of oppression for women, she fails in providing a feasible solution. Conceptually it falls apart; and inherent biases may have done more to damage its effectiveness, then aid in its insight.