SUMMARY Following is the summary of the opinions of the Lords of Appeal for judgement in the case Shogun Finance Limited (Respondents) vs. Hudson (FC) Appellant, Delivered on Wednesday 19th November 2003 This case deliberates on the situation where an impostor dupes a party then passes on the goods thus acquired to a third party. Five Learned Lords deliberate on various pros and cons of the issue and reject the appeal in favour of Respondents 3: 2. The …showed first 75 words of 2007 total…

…showed last 75 words of 2007 total…rogue and thus could not be passed on to Mr. Hudson. Mr Hudson does not have a clear title. I will dismiss the appeal. Reference: Cundy v. Lindsay (1878) 3 App Case 459 (HL). Gallie v. Lee (1969) 2 Ch 17, 30. Ingram v. Little (1961) 1 QB 31 Irish Statute Book Database: Hire-Purchase Act, 1964: Retrieved on 5th December 2005. http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/ZZA16Y1946.html King's Norton Metal Co. Ltd. v. Edridge Merrett & Co. Ltd. (1897) 14 TLR 98 Phillips v. Brooks (1919) 2 KB 243 (Horridge J).