Apparent progress due to a 'wall' restricting where random change can take things.
Title: Apparent progress due to a 'wall' restricting where random change can take things.
Category: /History/World History
Details: Words: 843 | Pages: 3 (approximately 235 words/page)
Apparent progress due to a 'wall' restricting where random change can take things.
Category: /History/World History
Details: Words: 843 | Pages: 3 (approximately 235 words/page)
Adapted from Gould 1996.
Others [cf Nitecki 1988] claim that there is only progress because any increase over zero is a net increase, and that different measures will give different results. The traditional notion of progress as an increase in perfection or optimality has been abandoned, for it rested on a view that goes back to the late neo-Platonists - the idea that all of reality is arranged in a heirarchy of increasing perfection. This is called
showed first 75 words of 843 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 843 total
explanations that are sometimes called teleology: telenomic (goal-seeking, Aristotle's final causes, 'for-the-sake-of-which' explanations); teleomatic (lawlike behaviour that is not goal-seeking); adapted systems (which are not goal seeking at all, but exist just because they survived); and cosmic teleology (end-directed systems) [cf O'Grady and Brooks 1988]. Only systems that are actively directed by a goal are truly teleological. Most are just teleomatic, and some (e.g., genetic programs) are teleonomic (internal teleology), because they seek an end.